Engagement at Work: Investigating the Relationships
Between
Age-Groups, Gender, Personality; and Trait Emotional
Intelligence
Stuart M. Leeds and Ben Steeden [supervisor]
Purpose: To add to and extend existing research of engagement at work with new findings regarding age-groups, gender, personality; and trait emotional intelligence (TEI).
Design: A cross-sectional correlation study with added mediator and moderator analyses. Exploratory analyses include two-tailed correlation, hierarchical multiple linear regression and additional mediator analysis.
A simple research question reflects the title:
What is the relationship between age-groups, gender, personality, TEI and; engagement at work?
The introduction begins with a general overview of engagement at work with an original description and then offers a modernised definition suggesting that engagement is a state of mind where people work hard because they enjoy it, rather than being a static state. Engagement is then characterised by three dimensions: vigour, dedication and absorption, defining how engaged employees approach work; and gives examples of necessary workplace requirements for the positive benefits of engagement to occur. Some positive and negative aspects of engagement are discussed, from individual well-being, to exhaustion and burnout. Criticism of engagement measures is introduced suggesting an over-accentuation of positive aspects which negate the reality of occupational conflict. Then examples of lack of engagement among UK employees are given using the Gallup 2021 State of the Global Workplace Report, followed by examples of previous research showing that engagement can be affected and predicted by various individual differences. The remaining variables (age-groups and gender, personality; and TEI) are described; and their use in the research is justified. Three hypotheses are given:
Hypothesis H1: The personality traits Openness to experience, Conscientiousness, Extroversion, Agreeableness and Emotional Stability will be positively correlated to work engagement.
Hypothesis H2: There will be a significantly positive relationship between age-groups and engagement mediated by higher TEI.
Hypothesis H3: Gender will moderate the relationship between age-groups and TEI such that it will be stronger for females than males.
\(159\) volunteers were recruited via bespoke online surveys measuring the usual demographics, personality, TEI; and work engagement of which \(88\) participants were used in the analysis. These were arranged into two age groups:
Group 1: \(51\) participants (\(25\) females and \(26\) males aged \(18-30\)).
Group 2: \(37\) participants (\(27\) females and \(10\) males aged \(50\) and above).
Of the main results:
H1 was partially supported in that those participants with higher conscientiousness, agreeableness and emotional stability were more likely to be engaged at work. No relationship was found between engagement and extroversion or openness to experience (see Figure 2).
H2 was not supported in that the relationship between age-groups and engagement is not mediated by higher TEI.
H3 was not supported in that the relationship between age-groups and TEI is not moderated by gender.
Exploratory results
Conscientiousness, emotional stability and agreeableness are the dominant personality traits that relate to engagement and each of its three dimensions.
Older workers have a higher TEI which also predicts engagement, though older workers are not more engaged because of a higher TEI.
Females from both age-groups are more likely to have higher TEI along with wellbeing and emotionality than males and therefore, are also more likely to be engaged at work.
TEI mediates the relationship between gender and engagement in support of female workers from both age-groups.
Conscientiousness and gender (females in both age-groups) predict engagement at work. TEI accounts for \(23\%\) variance, an increase of \(5\%\).
Implications
Questions or additional information requests to be directed to the main author.
This summary is also published at: